“High Site Fidelity Does Not Equate to Population Genetic Structure for Common Goldeneye and Barrow’s Goldeneye in North America.”

Joshua I. BrownPhilip LavretskyRobert E. WilsonChristy L. HaugheyW. Sean BoydDaniel EslerSandra L. TalbotSarah A. Sonsthagen First published: 05 October 2020

https://doi.org/10.1111/jav.02600

“Abstract

“Delineation of population structure provides valuable information for conservation and management of species, as levels of demographic and genetic connectivity not only affect population dynamics but also have important implications for adaptability and resiliency of populations and species. Here, we measure population genetic structure and connectivity across the ranges of two sister species of sea ducks: Barrow’s Goldeneye (Bucephala islandica) and Common Goldeneye (B. clangula). We use two different marker types: 7–8 nuclear microsatellite loci assayed across 229 samples and 3,678 double digest Restriction‐site Associated DNA Sequencing (ddRAD‐seq) loci assayed across 61 samples. First, both datasets found no evidence of genetic structure within Common or Barrow’s Goldeneye, including between North American and European samples of Common Goldeneye. These results are in contrast with previous mitochondrial DNA, band recovery, and telemetry data which suggest that goldeneyes are structured across their range. We posit that the discordance between autosomal genetic markers and other data types suggests that males, possibly subadult males, may be maintaining genetic connectivity across each species’ respective ranges. Next, although mate choice consequences resulting from inter‐specific brood parasitism was hypothesized to cause some level of gene flow between goldeneye species, we only identified a single F1 hybrid with no further evidence of contemporary or historical gene flow. Despite ddRAD‐seq demographic analyses which recovered an optimum evolutionary model of split‐with‐migration (i.e., secondary contact), estimates of gene flow were <<1 migrant per generation in both directions. Together, we conclude that either strong ecological barriers or assortative mating are likely playing a role in preventing further backcrossing. Finally, demographic analyses estimated a relatively deep divergence time between Barrow’s Goldeneye and Common Goldeneye of ~1.6 million years before present and suggests that the genomes of both species have been under similar evolutionary constraints.”

This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Here is a link to purchasing the complete article or using your institutional privilege to access it here:

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jav.02600

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s